Smoke Testing vs Unit Testing

Smoke testing and unit testing are two different types of software testing that are meant for different purposes in the development process.

Unit Testing

Unit tests are small, specific tests that target individual components or “units” of code, such as methods or classes. They are designed to verify that each part of the application works correctly in isolation. Unit tests are typically written by the developers and run frequently during the development process.

Smoke Testing

Smoke tests are broader in scope than unit tests and aim to check the basic functionality and stability of the entire application. They are often referred to as “build verification testing” and are used to determine whether the deployed build is stable enough for further testing.

Key differences

Scope: Unit tests are narrow and focused, while smoke tests are large-scale and cover basic functions of the entire system.

Purpose: Unit tests verify individual components, whereas smoke tests ensure the overall stability and basic functionality of the application.

Execution: Unit tests are typically run frequently during development, while smoke tests are often performed after a new build or deployment.

Speed: Unit tests are generally quick to execute, while smoke tests may take longer due to their broader scope.

Importance: Both types of testing are crucial, but they serve different purposes. Unit testing is often considered mandatory in many development processes, while smoke testing acts as a gatekeeper for further testing.

A tabular comparison between unit testing and smoke testing.

Feature	Unit Testing	Smoke Testing
Scope	Narrow, focused on individual components or “units” of code	Broad, covers the basic functionality of the entire system
Purpose	Verify individual parts work correctly in isolation	Determine if the deployed build is stable for further testing
Performed by	Typically developers	Often performed by testers or QA team
Frequency	Regularly during development	After new builds or deployments
Speed	Generally quick to execute	it may take longer due to broader scope
Depth	In-depth testing of specific functions	Surface-level testing of critical functionalities
Automation	Easily automated	It can be automated, but sometimes manual
Duration	More time-consuming to write	Relatively quick to create
Coverage	High code coverage for tested units	Low overall code coverage but covers critical paths
Complexity	Can involve complex scenarios for individual units	Usually involves simple, basic test cases

You may also like following the articles below

• Smoke Testing vs Sanity Testing vs Regression Testing

In summary, both unit testing and smoke testing are important parts of a comprehensive testing strategy. They complement each other and help ensure the quality and reliability of the software being developed.